Julian Assange and the Wikileak revelations that Changed the World

Part 1

Julian Assange is not only being persecuted for exposing war crimes by the military-industrial complex but for insinuating that Seth Rich was the source of the damning internal DNC emails given to Wikileaks. They say he was murdered by a simple robbery but Assange strongly insisted that Seth Rich was actually the source and that he was subsequently murdered for his rejection of the corrupt establishment. If this were true and he was allowed to speak it, who then ordered the hit job against this man?

Don't believe me? Then listen to Assange suggest it in his own words:

"Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks. There's a 27-year-old who works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered, just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the streets in Washington."

Interviewer:

"That was just a robbery, wasn't it? What are you suggesting?"

Assange:

"I am suggesting that our sources take risks. They become concerned to see things occurring like that. We don't comment on who our sources are. Because we have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States."

Interviewer:

"But it's quite something to suggest a murder. That's basically what you are doing.."

Assange responded to Adam Schiff's claim that the DNC leak was by the Russians by pointing out that the United States has interfered in at least 81 elections since 1950 and the Wikileaks emails proved that the DNC rigged the primary against Bernie Sanders for Clinton:

"The United States government since 1950 has intervened in eighty-one elections, interfered to use Schiff's language. That is not including coups which have overthrown the government. There is a long history of the United States doing this to places around the world. Infamous ways. I think we should understand that the United States is in a glass house when it comes to allegations of attempting to interfere with election results.

From our perspective, we have just published accurately and fairly what Hillary Clinton said her positions were in her secret speeches and any relation to the DNC and its attempt to rig the primary to exclude Bernie Sanders. The heart of the issue is whether people were told the truth about the DNC. If there hadn't been an ugly truth there, it wouldn't have made a difference."

Our source wasn't from the Russian state.

CNN came out to belittle investigations into Seth Rich's death by calling it a conspiracy theory and claiming we should have focused on the now debunked Trump-Russia collusion hoax which we now know for a fact was paid for by none other than Hillary Clinton through the Steele Dossier. They brought out a soy boy to tell us this was a crazy conspiracy theory yet it was Assange himself who kept insinuating that Seth WAS the source of the leaks. Remember that Clinton was claiming that the Russians leaked the emails.. It was the same hoax over and over. The FBI committed literal treason against Trump by attempting to frame him for Russia collusion.

CNN said there was no proof that Seth leaked the emails but guess what? No one has been allowed to see his laptop but the FBI. Why is that? Not only that but they fought against releasing information in regards to the laptop and have now buried in the sands of time.

Newt Gingrich as the mainstream media was focused on Clinton's bought and paid for Russia collusion hoax:

"We have this very strange story. Of this young man who worked for the Democratic National Committee. Who apparently was assassinated at four in the morning. Having given Wikileaks something like 53 emails. Nobody is investigating that. It turns out it wasn't the Russians. It was this young guy who I suspect was disgusted by the corruption of the Democratic National Committee."

Investigators went on to say he was killed by a "debauched robbery" and CNN went on to claim that there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever that he was the source. I'm sorry but how is Assange basically winking at people telling them that Seth was the source but he can't tell you not circumstantial evidence?

Listen to Seth's parents explain what happened and tell me you don't find this suspicious. He was shot in the back twice in the middle of the night at four in the morning and here's the kicker: They took absolutely nothing from him. There was no exchange of goods whatsoever. But it gets worse. Assange offered twenty thousand dollars for the discovery of his murderer. But did we ever find out who that was? Not from what I've seen. All I've seen is Julian Assange, perhaps the most heroic journalist of our time, face the Espionage Act and life in prison. And what about Seth Rich's parents? They sued saying that Seth couldn't access the emails so he couldn't have been the source. Um, what? What about Assange's intense interest in the case and the fact that he was practically winking at people that he WAS the source? Why is that ignored? If the mainstream media was honest they would have dug into this immediately with fervor. But the only honest reporter was instead jailed.

Free Julian Assange.

To be continued…

I took everyone’s advice and will split my digs into smaller chapters to make the content easier to digest. Thank you to everyone for your support.

If you’d like to support my digs and writings you can subscribe for just five dollars a month. A simple five-dollar-a-month subscription does wonders for me. If my writings have blessed you or made you think, your support would mean a lot. Thank you!