Who shot Robert Kennedy?

Robert Kennedy JR says that a CIA operative killed his father, explains how the autopsy report brings damning evidence that Sirhan couldn't have possibly killed his father, and the attorney for Sirhan coincidently was the same exact attorney for a mob boss implicated in the JFK assassination and ended up disappearing and cut into pieces before a committee could question him.

"When I sat down and read the autopsy report it became clear to me as it would to anyone who read that report that Sirhan did not kill my father.

-Sirhan fired two shots at my father. He was five feet away. It was absolute mayhem.

- Waiting in the kitchen was Sirhan Sirhan. As my father approached the table Sirhan fired at him, two shots. One of those hit Paul Schrade. The other one went past my father's ear and hit a wooden door jam.

-Sirhan was then grabbed in a dog pile and pointing the gun away from my father shot six shots. There were eight shots in the barrel. All of those shots hit people. We know who they hit. We know what happened to all of those bullets.

-Sirhan was the distractor. The real shooter was behind my father he was called Eugene Cesar who was a security guard who worked for Lockheed. He was a CIA operative. He was a vocal racist who hated the Kennedys.

-My father was shot four times from behind. All of the shots had an uphill trajectory. All of them, this is what the autopsy found, were contact shots. So the barrel of the gun was touching my father’s body or clothing. Less than an inch of his skin. They left carbon tattoos on his flesh.

-There were 77 eyewitnesses who saw that Sirhan was never behind my father.

-The police did not confiscate Cesar's gun that night

- There was no trial. It was a show trial. The attorney for Sirhan was the attorney for Johnny Roselli, the mobster who was implicated in John Kennedy's assassination five years earlier and was later chopped up and put in a barrel when the assassination committee summoned him to give testimony. He disappeared the day he was supposed to testify."

Click picture for accompanying video:

A week before RFK was killed, he declared that he would remove the clandestine services from the CIA. Not only that, but RFK's first assumption was that the CIA had killed his brother and he posed that very question publicly.

Due to his popularity, RFK was about to be put in a position to become President and therefore actually make reforms to the CIA or even dismantle it just as JFK before him had sought to do.

According to RFK JR, Cesar was a CIA asset. If this was truly the case, and Sirhan was simply an MK Ultra patsy, then now you know why they would have the motive to implement this plan.

RFK and JFK were both existential threats to the military-industrial complex and the above-the-law operations of the CIA.

JFK himself told us that he wanted to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the wind. Neither he nor his brother wanted to participate in the Vietnam War which turned out to be a CIA playground for psyop operations and countless crimes against humanity.

The CIA has never answered for these crimes and the Biden administration has actually been slow-rolling the release of information pertaining to the case.

Imagine what the world would have looked like had the Kennedy vision of dismantling the CIA taken place. Certainly, there would have been a lot fewer wars and regime changes disguised as "wars on terror."

Thomas Naguchi, the coroner for RFK, plainly tells us that there was soot in his hair shavings which tells us that a gun had to have been triggered within inches of his head. Scientifically speaking, soot travels only a few inches when a gun is fired.

Once Naguchi discovered this he did ballistics tests that proved that the shot was "one inch from the head of his right ear, only three inches BEHIND the head."

But here is the kicker, Karl Eucker, the man in between Kennedy and Sirhan, specifically told authorities that he "never got close enough for a point-blank shot." Not only this, he never got behind him because they refrained him as he shot the remaining bullets wildly into the crowd.

So not only was Sirhan not close enough to fire the kill shot but he wasn't behind him.

Naguchi's testimony was such a problem for them that they made sure he was fired and unable to debunk their carefully crafted myth.

The Autopsy report showed that the distance between the muzzle that fired the fatal shot and RFK's body was anywhere from point blank to three inches. Eyewitnesses tell us that Sirhan was at least five feet away from him when he began to fire his gun making it impossible for him to have been the one to shoot the bullet at point-blank range. The police never asked about the muzzle distance of shots until people began to pick apart the official story.

Reports of bullet holes in the pantry cause issues because of the limited amount of ammunition in Sirhan's weapon. What happened to those bullets? Sirhan's lawyer suggested that the FBI removed the door frames and ceiling panels and destroyed the evidence. Reminiscent of when the Feds removed the door with bullet holes that suggested they were the ones who instigated the deadly shootout in Waco isn't it?

I dug into Thomas Naguchi's book, Coroner, as he tells elaborated on the RFK autopsy. In this book, he plainly tells us that there was soot in his hair shavings which tells us that a gun had to have been triggered within inches of his head. Scientifically speaking, Soot travels only a few inches when a gun is fired.

Are you seeing it clearly now? Not only was Sirhan at least five feet away from RFK but he wasn't inches away or behind him.

A Forsenic audio expert analyzed the one existing audio tape of the RFK shooting and found that there were sounds of at least 10 shots being fired (possibly 13), within those shot sounds there were two instances of double shots (two shots so close together that they couldn't have come from a single gun), and that the security guard who RFK Jr alleges was the real shooter was holding a gun with similar rifling characteristics to the audio in the tape.

The gun that allegedly killed RFK was a .22 caliber Iver-Johnson Cadet revolver.

You can see from the photos that this weapon only carries eight rounds.

This means that only eight bullets could have been fired if Sirhan was the only shooter. But that was simply not the case.

So who was the second shooter?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2018/06/06/the-bobby-kennedy-assassination-tape-were-13-shots-fired-or-only-8/

“The conclusion is inescapable,” Van Praag wrote in a 2011 declaration in Sirhan’s case, “that there was a second gun fired by a second shooter during the shooting that resulted in the death of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and that the five shots from the second gun were fired in a direction opposite the direction in which Sirhan fired.

https://www.historicalfirearms.info/post/52226442432/the-gun-that-killed-rfk-22-caliber-iver-johnson

Thane Eugene Cesar was standing directly behind RFK, unlike Sirhan, and told the LAPD that he did, in fact, draw his weapon that night. He was so close to RFK that Cesar's tie was likely pulled off in the mayhem. They never checked his gun according to Sirhan's lawyer and he sold it. Cesar told police he sold the gun three months earlier but a paper trail said differently.

And then what happened? He moved out of the country to the Philippines. Remember when Jesus Campos left the country after the Mandalay Bay shooting even though he was the sole eye witness? The playbook seems to remain the same.

"Cesar was the obvious first suspect. The police brushed him off and never investigated him further."

It gets worse though, there is testimony that the security guard actually shot his gun during the incident. The gun was destroyed by the LAPD before the trial and then inexplicably never examined in connection with the bullets that hit the pantry that day.

The man that covered up the gun/bullets was off Scott free after he "mislabeled" his findings. They refused to give him a lie detector test.

And they said: We wouldn't give him a test because their findings said differently.

To sum it up, They didn't follow the proper procedures and covered up the entire thing.

Sirhan claims to have never remembered shooting RFK or essentially anything about the event. Even under hypnosis, after the fact, extracting information seemed impossible.

Under hypnosis, he remembers a woman who gave him coffee and lead him to a dark place. He was lying on a table and then the next thing he remembers is being restrained after shooting at RFK. He literally can't remember anything in between. A dark place and a coffee? Was he drugged?

Was he under hypnosis when the event happened? Did you know that Sirhan joined the mystical order of the Rosa Crucians and took to self-hypnotism.

This means he was a perfect person to act as the patsy, someone who was easily programmable.

Remember that documents show that an Ex CIA consultant admitted he could create a patsy in three months and it would take him six months to create a lone gunmen.

Now think about all the political figures assassinated by supposed lone gunmen.

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00552r000303090037-8

Operation Artichoke was also attempting to see if they could force an individual to involuntarily perform an assassination.

They used LSD, hypnosis, and other drugs in an attempt to create such a human weapon.

These are open-source documents yet some still say this is a conspiracy theory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Artichoke

Robert Kennedy’s ascension to the highest office in the land was tragically cut short. Ironically, he was very likely eliminated by a clandestine CIA operation, the type of operation he promised to shut down when he became President. The CIA’s history of immoral crimes against countries around the world has never truly been accounted for. The more that awaken to this truth, the greater the chance of justice and a worthwhile change that could restore peace to this world. The CIA has shown itself to be a purveyor of chaos and because Kennedy wished to prevent further bloodshed, he himself was a victim to their schemes.

If you’d like to support my writings and work you can subscribe for just five dollars a month. A simple five-dollar-a-month subscription does wonders for me. If my writings have blessed you or made you think, your support would mean a lot. Thank you!

For more information, you can watch these two feature-length films on the event: